Subscribe to this Site

  • Subscribe in Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Email Subscription



  • Powered by FeedBlitz

Contact Me:

My Squidoo Lens

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 10/2005

Google Search

  • Google Search
    Google

    WWW
    eq4pm.typepad.com
HitTail.com

leadership

November 05, 2007

What Makes Managers Successful?

I found an interesting study while conducting research for my "Smart People Dumb Mistakes" presentation.  The study looked at the factors that differentiated failed managers from successful ones.  The study looked at 169 managers where roughly half were terminated for performance issues and the other half were performing well.  The differences between the two groups were remarkable in that five of the eight factors were related to emotional intelligence:

Characteristics of Failed Managers:

  1. Unable to build a cohesive team*
  2. Over-manages or under-manages
  3. Overly ambitious
  4. Not supportive, and demanding of subordinates*
  5. Overly emotional*
  6. Insensitive, cold, and arrogant*
  7. Maintains poor relations with staff*
  8. Has overriding personality defects

*Factors directly related to emotional intelligence.

This study was conducted by Michael Lombardo, Marian Ruderman and Cynthia McCauley and is documented in the book, Why Smart People can be so Stupid.

PS:  On November 1 I launched the Monthly Newsletter, EQ for Project Managers.  The theme for November is Gratitude and you can sign up on my home page.

October 27, 2007

Twenty Emotional Intelligence Tips from AllPM

This month I was one of the guest contributors over at ALLPM.com where the theme was emotional intelligence for project managers.  I contributed the following list of daily tips for project managers and after looking at them, I realized they are pretty good!  So here are the 20 tips of the day from ALLPM.com, grouped according to the emotional intelligence framework for project managers shown below.  Enjoy!

Fig_24

1. SELF-AWARENESS

Tip of the Day #1 - David Caruso and Peter Salovey said that "emotions are information". Are you able to fully experience your emotions at work and use them as information? Or do you try to "leave emotions at the door" when you arrive at work? Try logging every emotion you feel throughout the day today. Later tonight, spend some time reflecting on those emotions and see if you can understand the information that each emotion provides.


Tip of the Day #5 - Do you recognize when you are experiencing feelings during the day? A simple technique for increasing emotional self-awareness is to track emotions during the day using SASHET, an acronym for Sad, Angry, Scared, Happy, Excited and Tender. Keep a SASHET tally sheet today and see if there are patterns in the emotions you feel and those you don't feel.

Tip of the Day #6 - Sarcasm is usually an indication that someone is both angry and scared. When you hear sarcasm, you should ask yourself what that person is angry and scared about. This is doubly important if you are the one using sarcasm. I challenge you to make note of the times today that you hear sarcasm being used and looked behind the sarcasm to the emotions of the individual.

Tip of the Day #7 - Most of us cringe when we hear negative feedback or criticism. Feedback is a gift. Even critical feedback usually contains some kernel of truth that helps us grow if we are open to it. When we hear critical feedback, we need to get over our own defensiveness, listen carefully, and ask probing questions that lead us to that kernel of truth. Our greatest growth opportunities will come from those ‘gifts’ from others.

Tip of the Day #10 - Self-confidence is when we are grounded, secure, and self-assured. It’s easy to be rattled or thrown off our game by a recent setback or failure. One technique for overcoming a lack of self-confidence is to reflect on our past successes. Create a timeline on a piece of paper and mark on it the successes, small and large, that you have experienced over your career. By reviewing our past successes, we can put our current setbacks into perspective and see them as temporary.

2. SELF-MANAGMENT

Tip of the Day #3 - There are times when we remain unruffled by others and times when we react strongly. Pay attention to those times when you let other people push your buttons. What are the specific conditions where you are likely to let your guard down? Is it when you are tired, stressed, sick, feeling unappreciated or criticized, or not taking care of yourself? Try to avoid putting yourself in those situations where you aren’t able to choose a graceful response.

Tip of the Day #9 - Many of us work in environments that are stressful. We can remain graceful and unruffled when we learn to reduce our own stress level. I have found that laughing out loud, going for a walk, spending time with people I like, breathing techniques, and prayer or meditation help me to unwind. Select one of these techniques and practice it today, even if you don’t really need it.

Tip of the Day #11 - Perfectionists find that people never quite measure up to their expectations. They can be just as hard on themselves as well. Instead of going for perfection, strive for excellence which can be defined as doing your very best in every situation. Celebrate excellence and don’t get sucked into thinking that everything needs to be perfect.

Tip of the Day #15 - Some of us set ourselves up for stressful situations or negative outcomes by arriving late or unprepared for early morning meetings with team members or other project stakeholders. This can cause us to lose momentum or feel lousy for the rest of the day. Next time you have an important meeting, try getting to bed early, getting up early, and getting in to work before everyone else. Allow yourself some quiet time to review your notes and objectives for the meeting as well as to think about the emotions of each person that will be attending. Your calmness and quiet confidence will show clearly and even be contagious.

3. Social Awareness


Tip of the Day #8 - If you want to boost your standings with your project team, learn to listen with empathy. This includes giving others your full attention when they are speaking and letting them speak instead of interrupting or finishing their sentences. When they have expressed themselves, respond with empathy and emotions (e.g. that sounds tough, you sound sad). Finally, ask them what you can do to help. Don’t assume that you have to solve their problems or tell them what to do.

4. RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT

Tip of the Day #2 - Project management is about getting work done through others. Rarely is anything of significance done by one person working alone. It is the relationships we build with our team members and other stakeholders that determine how effective we will be as project managers. Take an honest assessment of the most important stakeholder relationships for your current project. Make it a point today to meet with those individuals with the objective of improving your relationship with them.

Tip of the Day #4 - Mom always said “If you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all”. Unfortunately that approach can lead to a dangerous buildup of hurts over minor and major issues. A better approach is to keep short accounts with people by saying, “I don’t like it when you do/say X”. This frees us up from holding on to resentments and avoids a major explosion down the road.

Tip of the Day #12 - Picnicking is a term for people who eat their lunches alone at their desk, ostensibly because of their workload. This is isolating and keeps us out of relationship. Instead of eating alone, make it a point to go to lunch with a co-worker, team member, or a project stakeholder. The relationship you will build will produce benefits far greater than what you would gain by working through lunch at your desk.

Tip of the Day #13 - While we all strive to do our best to build relationships, we will invariably find that we don’t always get along with others. If you find yourself consistently having relationship problems, look for patterns of those problems. Since we are the common denominator in our relationships, we may be the cause of the pattern of breakdowns. Some of us unknowingly carry emotional baggage with us. By becoming aware of the pattern, we empower ourselves to do something about it.

Tip of the Day #14 - People tend to thrive on positive recognition and acknowledgment and wither on criticism. Since it was always easier for me to point out what was wrong than to recognize what was right, I had to push myself and build routines into my day and week to be more encouraging. One technique I found helpful was to keep a log of when I recognized various team member’s positive contributions. Try keeping a tally sheet of your team and mark down whenever you are able to recognize one of your team members. Strive for at least one positive or encouraging comment per person each day.


Tip of the Day #18 - Relationship-building is a task you will rarely find on a project plan or in a WBS. However, as a project manager, building relationships with project stakeholders is a major success factor. Don’t leave stakeholder relationships to chance; give this activity the same importance as other project management tasks. Add relationship building tasks to your ‘to do’ and ‘action item’ lists, block out time on your calendar for relationships, and track your progress in this important area.

5. TEAM LEADERSHIP


Tip of the Day #16 - The project manager has the opportunity to establish ground rules, values, or expectations for the behavior of the team. If you don’t set those up at the start of the project, you may be surprised to find that people behave badly and team members don’t respect you as the leader. Try working with your team to create a contract for behavior early in the project lifecycle. This will make everyone a part of the process and accountable for enforcing whatever rules are agreed.

Tip of the Day #17 - My mentor Robb used to say that you live or die by your project team. Getting the best resources is critical to your success; this shouldn’t be left up to chance or to the resource managers in your company. You will attract and retain great project resources when you develop your interpersonal skills (like emotional intelligence), lead with integrity, and create a positive project environment.

Tip of the Day #19 - Holding others accountable is a key part of the project manager’s job; if you are not doing it you are not leading. I sometimes find it challenging to hold senior managers, clients, or project sponsors accountable because I fear confrontation with them. It has helped me to pinpoint the source of my fear, challenge whether it is valid or not, and then move forward through the fear. It also helps to have a tool like a Responsibility Matrix to clearly communicate who is accountable for project activities.

Tip of the Day #20 - As the leader of the team, the project manager sets the emotional tone for the group. Do you emote positive feelings and create what Daniel Goleman calls “resonance”? Or do you tend to give off negative vibes and create “dissonance”? Take time today to ask one or two of your current team members if they experience you as positive and encouraging. Listen as quietly as you can, without defending, and try to note at least one or two things you can do differently to boost your resonance level.

October 18, 2007

Right Message, Wrong Audience - CIOs are People Who Need People

I read an article on CIO.com that got me riled up.  The article, Relationships:  CIOs are People Who Need People, talks about how important it is for CIOs to build relationships with stakeholders.  This was based on a meeting of the CIO Executive Council members who discussed best practices for relationship building.

It wasn't the message that got me excited; clearly CIOs need to build relationships.  In fact, the article basically described many of the relationship management approaches and techniques that we have talked about here on this blog.  This includes things like:

  • Identifying your important stakeholder relationships
  • Meeting individually with each of your important stakeholders
  • Building your relationship skills like communicating, collaborating, listening without being defensive, and being flexible
  • Ongoing relationship-building as an integral part of your job

The article even talks about a "Relationship Template" that sounds very similar to the stakeholder management tool we use in our EQ workshops for project managers and IT professionals.

What got me excited was the idea that they wrote this for CIOs.  Of course CIOs need relationship building and other emotional intelligence competencies.  You can't get the top technical job in a real company without those skills.  Does anyone think that individuals can progress in their career all the way to CIO without having these skills?  What, they get the job then all of a sudden they need to start building relationships?  I don't think it is is possible.  I mean, the only way I can imagine that someone can become a CIO without these skills would be if their dad owned the company.

One of the CIOs quoted in the article was a perfect example of why you can't wait to become a CIO to develop relationship skills.  Tom Langston of SSM Health Care Systems acknowledged that it was his relationships with the COO and the SVP of HR that got him the job as CIO.  I think the fact that he had no prior IT experience shows the relative importance of relationship skills to technical experience.   

And that is my beef.  The CIO Executive council is focused on the wrong audience.  They shouldn't focus on CIOs; it's too late for them.  If you got to be a CIO without emotional intelligence then you should probably thank your lucky stars and quietly get busy boning up on those important skills. 

CIOs should be focused more strategically on helping the up and coming IT professionals in the IT department.  They should be stressing the importance of relationship building skills and emotional intelligence.  It is those aspiring IT professionals who need to learn that being effective is more than just laying down quality Java code.  If they want to be CIO some day, these IT professionals need to learn to build effective relationships, empathize with their customers and stakeholders, and exercise control over their own emotions.  They need relationships and emotional intelligence more than technical skills, as Tom Langston's experience clearly demonstrates.

It's the right message but I think they are speaking to the wrong audience. 

I'd love to hear your thoughts - Anthony Mersino

September 29, 2007

Working With Difficult People #01

One of the biggest workplace challenges for many of us is our relationships with others.  When I ask my workshop participants what are their biggest emotional intelligence challenges, most responses relate to dealing with difficult people.  Consider these common examples:

  • Team members criticize each others performance to the PM
  • Uppper management openly criticizes individuals in meetings
  • An individual sends a flaming email that results in unnecessary swirl of activity
  • A peer goes over your head to senior management without talking to you
  • A team lead inflates their own value and devalues work of others

As project managers, we need the ability to effectively deal with lots of different types of people in order to be successful.  Whether or not we’ll find them difficult or not is a function of two factors.  The first is our skill level as project managers at dealing with different people.  The second factor is the style, personality, and manageability of the other person we are dealing with.

 

If we were to plot these two factors against each other, it might look something like the drawing below that shows project manager skill level vs. the difficulty level of the other.  We are at greatest risk (the red zone) when our own skill level is low and we are dealing with people who are very difficult.  The lowest risk is when we are skilled and the other person is not very difficult. 

Difficultpeoplegrid_copyIt is important to appreciate the contribution of both of these factors.  By looking at and improving our own skill level, we empower ourselves to deal with others effectively.  If we ignore our own power and focus only on the other person, we will sound like a victim who is entirely at the mercy of others. 

But we aren't responsible for all the problems of working with difficult people of course.  There are some people who are hurt, broken, mean, manipulative, psychotic, and flawed.  The fact is that there are some people that are hard to manage for anyone.  To ignore that and assume we are so good at leading that it doesn’t matter would be both a denial of reality and a confidence bordering on narcissism. It is also unrealistic and impractical to think about changing others.  Instead, we will look at ways of managing others that is most likely to give us the result we want and need.

So in these posts on working with difficult people, we will focus on building our skills at influencing and leading all people.  We will also strive to understand the various ways that people may be difficult so that we can be prepared to recognize and deal with them.  It is quite similar to managing risks; we need to be aware of what can happen to our projects and prepare plans to deal with them. 

Some specific things we will be looking at include:

  • What are the nuances of the different groups of people we need to manage (e.g. managers, technical people, sponsors, other PMs, vendors, other team members)?
  • What are effective leadership strategies for managing or leading those different groups of people?
  • How do we recognize different types of difficult people?
  • How can we remain unruffled and graceful when dealing with people who are difficult?
  • How do we choose effective responses to difficult people to move toward our goals?

Are you challenged by difficult people in the workplace?  I'd like to hear your comments and feedback.

September 08, 2007

Too Much Employee Recognition Leads to High Turnover

My seven year old son recently walked into my home office and said, "Dad, you're pretty smart".  The kid is obviously a genius and a great judge of character.

Turns out he was doing an assignment for school.  He was supposed to give a compliment, then draw a picture of the recipient's face immediately afterward.  I think the idea is for him to draw a connection between how people feel when they are recognized.  (This is part of the PATHs Curriculum I have mentioned here before).

I am so glad that they are teaching emotional intelligence at school that I bought this bumpersticker for my car:

Bumperstickerv2_copy_2

His assignment was a great idea and it really got me thinking about the scarcity of compliments and recognition at home and at work.  I also think that would be a great assignment for all of us to take on today.  Go out and compliment or recognize at least three people, then draw the faces of the recipients immediately after the compliment. 

What is so relevant about this seven year-old's assignment is that we should all be doing it all the time.  As leaders, we all need to do a great job of recognizing the strengths and contributions of others.  Recognition is one of the easiest yet most underutilized tools that project managers and leaders have.  I've said it before, but it bears repeating.  No one ever quit a job because of too much recognition!  Could you imagine if someone actually gave that as a reason for leaving?  It would be unheard of.

"My supervisor was always coming in and telling me what a great job I was doing. It was annoying really because I was just doing my job. Eventually I just got fed up with it and decided to go elsewhere."
     - Disgruntled Employee

In fact, Marcus Buckingham contends that regular recognition is one of the twelve measures of the strength of a workplace.  In First Break All the Rules, he uses the following question to gauge strength of the workplace:

"In the last seven days, have you received recognition or praise for good work?"

(Disclaimer:  I am a huge fan of Marcus Buckingham especially after hearing him speak live at the Willow Creek Leadership Summit last month.)  In any case, regular recognition is something that we can all work on.  Do you want to improve the emotional mood of your workplace?  Try the exercise.  Recognize somebody you work with and pay attention to the look on their face.  Hopefully it will be a happy face.  If you haven't done much of it in the past, you might also get surprise or shock.

In fact, you might make this an exercise you do for a whole week.  Here is a little tally sheet of faced you can print out and use to track the results.  Just circle or put a little check mark beside the face you get when make a compliment.  I challenge you to do that for the next week and then post a comment back on your results.

Reactionstocompliments

April 12, 2007

Check Your New Bosses EQ BEFORE You Sign On

I read an interesting post by Guy Kawasaki about using LinkedIn technology and good old fashioned networking to check out the emotional intelligence of a prospective manager.  What a smart idea, I mean, who wants to unknowingly get stuck working for some schmuck or worse, a total psychopath?  It is easy to get nervous during an interview and forget that we need to check out the hiring manager as much as they are checking out us.

The point Guy makes is that you can use a new feature in LinkedIn to track down people that worked at that company at the same time as your prospective boss.  (By the way I tried this and was bummed to find out that you need to be a LinkedIn Business User to take advantage of this feature.  Why promote LinkedIn's premium features?)

Anyway, once you locate people who have worked at the same company as your prospective boss, you contact them and ask about the new boss.  While Guy did not call it an EQ Check, the 10 questions that he suggested you ask (well, actually Bob Sutton of the No Asshole Rule book suggested them) are classic emotional intelligence questions.  In fact, the very first question was on "kiss up and kick down" which is code for "has zero emotional intelligence" and lacks in social awareness and relationship management skills.  "Short fuse" is someone who is lacking in emotional self-control.  I won't repeat all 10 questions here but would suggest you check out Guy's blog for more detail.

Let me toss a few of my own ideas on the pile for consideration.  Here are three additional profiles of individuals you will want to avoid based on low emotional intelligence:

#1 - Micromanagers and Critics
Micromanagers and critics are people who want to control or criticize everything you do.  They often have difficulty with trust, control, and delegation.  They may be perfectionists and find fault with everything you do.  The underlying emotion for micromanagers and critics is fear.

As your boss, a micromanager can be impossible to work with.  They will check in on you too often, dictate how to do things, and always seem to know the one best way to complete a task.  They may be also perfectionists and constantly pick apart your work or ask you to revise it. 

#2 Dishonest Managers
Dishonest managers range from those who occasionally tell little white lies to those who lie compulsively and may even cheat or steal.  This category would also include those who act unethically or ask you to act in unethical ways.  The underlying emotions for dishonesty  could be anger or fear. 

A dishonest boss can misrepresent the truth about you and your efforts.  They may take credit for your work or blame you for their own mistakes.  They may project dishonesty on you and discount or discredit what you say and do.  It is especially dangerous to have a boss who asks you to act in unethical ways. 

#3 Cavemen
I am not talking about the funny cavemen from the Geico commercials here, I am thinking more like Imus.  These cavemen are the relics of the past.  They include bullies, powerfreaks, racists, and sexists.  They tell off-color jokes, use racial epitaths, or single out individuals and pick on them.  They may think they are just having fun with others by teasing when they are simply trying to cloak their aggression in humor.  They are usually men but women may also fall into this category.

As your boss, cavemen may make it a point to show you who is boss or get off on treating you like dirt.  They may try to make themselves feel more powerful by singling out you or one of your peers and trying to humiliate you in front of a group.  Or, they may make unwanted sexual overtures or discriminate against members of the opposite sex.  They may label groups of people and use derogatory language toward people who are different from themselves.

If it is too late for you and you find yourself working for someone with low emotional intelligence, be afraid, be very afraid.  The last thing you'll want to do is try to build a strong relationship with them or worse, try to straighten them out.  If you can, get out to another job at the same company or even to another company.

March 29, 2007

Perfection Vs. Excellence in Leadership

I read an interesting post on Perfection by Dr. Ellen Weber over at Brain Based Business, Why Perfectionism is Bad for the Brain.  Dr. Weber talked about the downside of perfectionism and how much it can hurt individually as well when working on teams.

As a project manager, I have lead a number of project teams.  I have been labeled as too critical and as a perfectionist before and so the article stung a little.  I know there is a fine line between high expectations and perfectionism.  So here is the thing that I wonder about as a frequent leader of teams- how do you encourage (push?) people to be the best they can be without coming off as critical and a perfectionist?

The topic reminds me of the style of leadership that Daniel Goleman calls the pacesetting style.  In Primal Leadership, written by Goleman, Boyatzis, and McKee, Pacesetters are described as individuals with a high personal drive to achieve.  They drive those around them very hard and make it clear that they expect excellence and are disatisfied with anything less.  They push for continuous improvement and put pressure on all team members to perform at their highest level.    Highjump

The upside of pacesetting leadership is that you raise the bar for others.  Studies have shown that people will generally perform at about the level that we expect.  If we don't expect much from team members, they aren't likely to overdeliver.  Conversely, when we expect a lot, we generally get it.

The downside of the pacesetter style of leadership is exactly the point made by Dr. Weber; paralysis.  When a pacesetting leader says they are dissatisfied with the current performance, team members feel alienated, criticized, and unappreciated.  "Why bother?" is what team members may say in response to a pacesetting leader.

How do we strike a balance between expecting a lot from people without seeming like a perfectionist?  Clearly I am still learning in this area, but here are five tips I would recommend.  I also welcome you to weigh in with your own thoughts.

  1. Set Goals with the Team - Many leaders don't set goals with the team; choosing instead to criticize or draw attention to areas of improvement.  Try setting stretch goals that are achievable and do so in advance.  This lets people know what you expect and gives them a chance to buy in.
  2. Make a habit of recognizing the positive - If you are the type who always recognizes the positive, people will know you see the entire picture even though you expect a lot and sometimes seem to be picky about the results.  Get in the habit of catching people doing something right as much as you can. 
  3. Set the bar high for others, but get feedback - Holding the bar high is great; sometimes though we need to check in to make sure we are realistic.  Most people I have encountered like to have the bar held high, that is, they want me to have high expectations for them.  To be effective though, I need to check back with them to make sure that the bar isn't too high.
  4. Lead by personal example - We communicate as strongly with our actions as with our words.  Set high standards for yourself and follow through on what you say you will do.  Strive to do your very best work every day.
  5. Focus on excellence, not perfection - Excellence is about doing the best we can do; perfection is unattainable for humans.

November 01, 2006

How NOT to Tell the Truth and Build Your Team

One of the areas where emotional intelligence is helpful is telling the truth.  I know that telling the truth is pretty simple, right?  Well, not necessarily. 

Consider the case of the Florida police chief who was recently fired.  He had grown tired of looking around the members of his force and seeing a bunch of overweight individuals.  So he sent a memo to the force calling them Jelly Bellies and telling why it would be good for them to get in shape.  As a result, the team morale sagged and the police chief was sacked.

Clearly I am an armchair quarterback to this whole episode but it does make the point that telling the truth is rarely simple.  I think the police chief had the right message - it would be healthier and better for the force if the members got in shape and stayed in shape.  He thought he was doing the right thing to help the team.  But the way he delivered his message was not effective in helping him to reach his goal.

In the Emotional Intelligence Framework for Project Managers, I include Truth Telling as one of the competencies of Relationship Management.  I believe that telling the truth, in an appropriate way, is what leads us into deeper relationships with others.  Here are seven technniques we can use as leaders and project managers to tell the truth to others.

Fig_63

#1 Providing your reaction

We all have reactions to things that others do and say.  It is entirely appropriate to provide your reaction, especially if you are asked.  For example, if your boss went overboard with criticism of a team member you could say “my reaction was that you probably didn’t need to be as harsh to get your point across.  I think you were scared and operating out of fear”.

#2 Saying No

Saying no is something that many of us struggle with.  After all, when we are asked to do something, most of us like to say yes.  For some of us, we say yes to show that we are helpful and competent.  For others, we say yes to be liked or to be valued.  As a result, we may say yes or agree to things that we really should say no to.  How many of us have ended up taking home extra work and even disrupting personal plans because we were unwilling to say no?  How many of us, when asked, find it impossible to say no when it is necessary or when it will serve us the most?  Later when we are asked about it, we are likely to say something like, “I couldn’t say no”. 

Our inability to say no was the subject of a recent book by Dr. Susan Newman, The Book of No; 250 Ways to Say It – and Mean It and Stop People-Pleasing Forever  .  Dr.  Newman gives us the following reasons for why we say yes when we should say no:

  1. Most people have been programmed to think saying No is negative
  2. Our inability to think clearly about what is being asked due to fear or guilt

For some of us, saying no is a muscle we simply have not practiced using.  We tend to think yes first without thinking about it then later we regret having responded that way.  We try not to offend or disappoint without realizing that by saying no in the first place, we are less likely to disappoint others. 

When we cannot say no, we set ourselves up in a couple of ways.  First, we cannot honestly say yes to anything.  If we never say no, we always say yes.  Our yes might actually be a “yes for now but I am going turn it into a no later”.  We may say yes but in reality never intend to follow through and deliver whatever it was we agreed to in that moment.  We will somehow sabotage that yes and ultimately make it a no.

The second way we set ourselves up is by feeling like the victim.  We may say yes now only to be able to resent others and make them pay later.  Think about situations where you or someone you know volunteered to do something and then complained and showed resentment afterward.  This may be a recurrent pattern in your life or their life.  Some people volunteer and then find themselves stewing about others who did not volunteer.

As a project manager, saying yes too much can damage our careers.  We cannot always say yes to additional work, change requests, vacation requests, changes in responsibilities, or requests for individuals to be promoted or take on larger roles on the project.  We need to know when to say no.  If we don’t protect ourselves and our team by saying no, we will alienate our team and perhaps even cause them to leave the project.  I am not suggesting that we always say no, rather, we need to be able to say no and to say yes with honesty and integrity.  We need to remember that we have a choice and that we should exercise that choice.  Saying yes when we don’t mean it can be far more damaging than saying no when we need to.

#3 Using “I like / I dislike” Statements

A very helpful technique for relationship-building is to state what we like or dislike.  You might say, “I like when you get your deliverables done on time” as a way to encourage your team members.  A higher risk version is when you say “I didn’t like when you made that disparaging comment about Bob”.  That type of communication is clear and to the point. 

Another example of stating what you like is when you have a group trying to make a decision.  Let’s say a group of 6 are trying to decide where to go for lunch.  If someone suggested that you go to a Chinese restaurant, and you really did not like Chinese food, it would be responsible to say something like “I don’t like Chinese food”.  That is stating what you like or dislike. 

What makes it hard is if we don’t want to appear selfish, we don’t want to offend others, or for any other reason we withhold.  In that case, we don’t say how we feel about the Chinese food and we wind up eating at the Chinese restaurant.  We feel miserable, angry, and resentful of the others in the group.  The reality is that we could have avoided that resentment by speaking up about how we felt. 

#4 Using “I need” and “I want” statements

Closely related to the concept of likes and dislikes is the concept of stating our wants and needs.  When we state in a clear and direct way what we want or need, we greatly increase our chances of getting it.  This simple sounding technique may often prove difficult to do in practice. 

Many of us have developed erroneous beliefs about expressing our wants and needs.  Some common beliefs about wants and needs include:

  • we won’t get what we want by asking for it directly
  • asking directly for something is vulnerable and puts us at risk
  • if someone really cared about us, then they would know what we wanted without us having to tell them

Many of us learned to manipulate instead of asking for things directly.  We might say something manipulative like “I knew you liked Chinese food so that is what I ordered” instead of the more truthful “I wanted Chinese food for lunch so that is what I ordered”.

One of the most powerful phrases I learned to say in the context of a project was “I need you to do a favor for me”.  Early in my career, it would have felt very vulnerable for me to say that.  As I grew as a project manager and learned more about emotional intelligence, I found that asking others directly for what I needed was liberating.  I could be clear and clean in my communications by just stating what it was that I wanted or needed from others. 

#5 Stating your Beliefs or Judgments

A belief or a judgment is something we feel about others based on our own values.  These beliefs or judgments are based on what we think about the feelings or motivations of others.  It is the rough equivalent of saying, “If I were you in this situation, I would be feeling angry”.  It sounds like “my judgment is that you are angry”. 

As an example, consider when you have a team member who habitually arrives late and leaves early.  While they have been productive for you and for the team, lately they seem to have other priorities.  You might say “my judgment is that you aren’t giving the team your best effort”.  That is a clear communication which can start a healthy discussion about expectations.  You might follow it up with “I want you to arrive by 8:00 every day” or some other request which indicates the specific behavior you expect from them.


#6 Getting clear

Getting clear with someone means that you are addressing any anger or conflict in the relationship.  It is the emotional intelligence of cleaning your windshield of bugs and dirt.  Getting clear requires that we voice any issues that we have with another person.  You might say something like “that hurt when you didn’t show up prepared for the staff meeting the other day.  What was going on?”   

It helps when we include our own emotions in the process of getting clear.  We might say something like the following:  “I felt sad and angry when you made that joke at the staff meeting yesterday during my presentation.  I had worked hard on that presentation and I wanted to make the point that everyone could do a better job on quality.  In the future I want you to refrain from making comments that take the team off track.”

The point of getting clear is that it frees us to move on and focus on other things.  Like having a clean windshield, we no longer have issues that bog us down.  We don’t have to carry any of the emotional baggage of issues or conflict; we can voice them and forget them.

I recently worked for a manager who was great about getting clear and then forgetting about it.  In one memorable occasion, he sharply criticized me for an email that I had sent to a wide distribution list.  My email was poorly written and sounded critical of him.  He told me that he didn’t like the email and he wanted me to limit the distribution list on emails that were critical of him.  Later, when I called him to apologize about my email, he was completely over it.  He had made his point and then he moved on and let it go.  He felt “clear” and he let me know that the issue wasn’t going to let it affect our relationship. 


#7 Keep Short Accounts

A closely related concept to getting clear is the idea of keeping short accounts.  To keep short accounts means to not let small issues build up into larger ones.  This is a trap that many of us fall into. 

How do you respond in situations where there are small hurts or issues?  Do you address each one?  We might feel like it is better to simply let them go or ignore them.  We may also feel that we are showing “grace” if we overlook small hurts or issues.  The problem with that approach is that the issues tend to build into larger issues. We need to get clear on those small issues on a regular basis so that we don’t end up with overwhelming resentment or anger.

The benefit of keeping shorting accounts is that we can get a more objective view of what happened.  Often we will find when clearing up small issues on a regular basis, that we didn’t have the complete picture, others were unaware, or that we actually contributed to the problem.  Rarely have I experienced these small hurts as being intentional on the part of the other person.  Sometimes it is possible that we caused it. 

What about being on the receiving end of someone who has not kept short accounts?  Have you ever had a project team member or other stakeholder blow up and tell you about everything you have done wrong in the last year?  Have you been surprised with the level of anger expressed over seemingly small issues or perceived slights?  This is the case of holding in those hurts and resentments. 

Keeping short accounts as a PM means that we don’t let resentments, wounds or anger build over time.  If we have an issue, we address it quickly.  Project managers need to lead in relationships and encourage others to keep short accounts with us.

Try these seven techniques and see if they help you to tell the truth and deepen your relationships.  Let me know if they keep you from getting fired.  If you have other techniques that help you tell the truth, I invite you to share them.

July 10, 2006

New Emotional Intelligence Resource for Leaders

I stumbled across this interesting review of the book Resonant Leadership.  That book was written by Richard Boyatzis and Annie McKee.  The review is titled The Difference between Leaders and Managers, and it was written by Steve Denning.

You may recall that Boyatzis and McKee were co-authors with Daniel Goleman of Primal Leadership.  As I read the review of the Resonant Leadership text, it sounded a lot like that text.

Denning makes some interesting points about the book.  The one that resonated with me (pun intended) was that the author espouse that leaders need to apply emotional intelligence but they provide little or no guidance on how to apply emotional intelligence.  I hope that readers of this space find what is posted here helpful, specific, and detailed enough for readers to understand how to apply emotional intelligence. 

June 27, 2006

Applied EQ #51: The Coaching Leadership Style for Project Managers

I have been reviewing the six leadership styles from the book Primal Leadership, by Daniel Goleman and co-authors Richard Boyatzis and Annie McKee.  Those six leaderships style include:

  • Coaching
  • Visionary
  • Affiliative
  • Democratic
  • Pacesetting
  • Commanding

I have been evaluating how each of these styles works in the project management arena.  Here is a description of the coaching style as applied to project management.

The coaching style focuses on personal development, rather than the accomplishment of tasks.  A PM with a coaching style sees the project as the vehicle for the development of the members of the team. The goal of accomplishing the project is almost secondary to the goal of helping people to learn and grow.

The coaching style reminds me of what Marcus Buckingham wrote about Dr. Donald Clifton of The Gallup Organization in his book The One Thing You need to Know.  Dr. Clifton said about the American Management Association.  He said that the AMA should change their slogan from “Getting work done through people” to “Getting people done through work” .  The point of the statement is that the work or the project is the vehicle that we can use to help people stretch, grow, and develop.

I had an excellent manager for several years named Robb who was a terrific example of the coaching style.  We worked together on three large projects over the course of about four years.  Robb showed great interest in my development and he encouraged me to develop and share with him my long term goals.  He showed how my current assignment would benefit me and how it connected to my long term goals and objectives. 

One hallmark of Robb’s style was his use of the one page weekly objectives.  He even broke the project down into one-page weekly objectives.  We would sit down each week together to develop the objectives.  We started by reviewing the objectives from the previous week, discussing in detail the progress that was made and any hurdles or issues.  Then we would jointly set the objectives for the next week.

An example of the one-page weekly objectives is shown below.  Though this may appear cryptic because of the use of shorthand, we both understood precisely what the document meant.  For example, in the figure below, the A’s, B’s and C’s reflected priority.  The initials at the top of the page indicated that both of us were committed to the goals.

Rk_sample_2_v3The one-page objectives are not necessary to use the coaching style.  What is necessary is to be involved at the detail level.  The coach helps the team member with specific steps and provides encouragement and feedback as they perform.

Another key to the coaching style is belief in the ability of the team member.  I always felt that Robb firmly believed that I could do anything.  He didn’t seem to think that I had any limitations and his one-page weekly objectives often included stretch goals that I would not even have attempted had he not encouraged me to believe they were possible. 

Robb’s belief in me encouraged me to try to accomplish the goals even when I didn’t think they were possible or didn’t see a way to make them happen. Once when I was working for him I ran into some trouble meeting key project milestones.  I wanted to take the easy route of simply pushing out the schedule which would delay the entire project, cost my company money, and disappoint the client.  Robb told me flat out to go back to the drawing board and come up with a solution that did not involve delaying the project.  His confidence that I could do it encouraged me to go look for that creative solution.  I didn’t know better and chose to believe that there must be a creative solution if Robb thought that there was one.

It is easy for me to understand why the coaching style leads to high motivation levels for the team members.  I felt motivated to meet the high expectations Robb had for me.  I wanted to do what he asked me to do.  In fact, I continually raised my own internal standards and expectations based on his expectations for me.  If he thought I could do it, then I chose to believe that I could.

The coaching style works best when employees seek direction and feedback and are willing to partner very closely to get agreement on the work to be performed.  It requires a high level of trust between the coach and the team member.

The coaching style doesn’t work when trust is lacking, when employees are not interested in getting input on their performance, or when they feel micromanaged.  On a recent project, I consciously applied the coaching style to 4 different junior members of the same team.  With two of the members, I was very successful.  Those two team members saw our work together as an investment and kept requesting feedback on a regular basis. 

The coaching style failed with the other two team members who saw the same style as de-motivating, critical, and micromanaging.  These two team members who did not like the coaching found it demeaning.  They wanted to have the latitude to work without checking in with the boss.  The difference that I saw in the relationships where it worked and where it did not work was the level of trust.  In those cases where the employee thought I had their best interest in mind, it worked great.  When the employee did not feel that I had their best interest in mind, it failed.